MAIS 601

I have been grappling with Sara Ahmed’s (2009) insights in her article, Embodying Diversity: Problems and Paradoxes for Black Feminists, and I must admit that it is a lot to unpack. Is it normal to feel bad for being white? This question often weighs on me, especially as I consider how to fully grasp the experiences of those who are visibly different from me. I have been hailed into my social role, which, as philosopher Louis Althusser put it, alters my perspective on race and privilege in complex ways (Notes on Althusser: Ideology and Interpellation-CAH News, 2017). This raises the question, what does this mean for me in conversations about diversity? I want to engage authentically but am unsure how to balance my discomfort with my goal of being a supportive ally.  Equity Studies is particularly interesting because engaging with equity requires me to reflect on the privilege that comes with my racial identity.  This alone is intriguing as it can be both challenging and rewarding. It involves questioning systems that may have benefitted me while understanding the barriers that others face.  Understanding is a loose concept because I will never know what it is like to be marginalized.  However, this focus area allows me to use my position to support change that is, hopefully, meaningful. Diversity plays a key role in this; however, diversity may not be the most accurate terminology.

​

Ahmed’s (2009) critique of the term "diversity" resonates deeply with me. She describes it as a pretty, cuddly, politically correct term that glosses over the more profound issues of racism, whiteness, and inequality (p. 44). I completely agree with this description. In fact, I recently referred to diversity in a discussion forum as a trend; the trend for organizations to hop on the diversity train. It often feels like a marketing strategy, where organizations claim to embrace diversity without truly addressing the systemic issues underneath. Organizations frequently use the term diversity as a shiny facade to mask their deeper issues. As Ahmed (2009) further explains, it is comparable to a “shiny apple with a rotten core” (p. 45). On the surface, these organizations may appear inclusive, but genuine structural changes are absent. Organizations need to demonstrate a real commitment to addressing systemic issues rather than just adopting trendy language (Discussion Paper on Systemic Racism, 2023).  For example, many organizations still need to hire people of colour or actively promote diversity within their leadership teams. If these simple steps are not taken, then any claims of valuing diversity highlight performative rather than transformative change.

​

When reflecting on images organizations post on social media, I cannot help but question whether they reflect the reality of our communities. More often than not, they do not. These images serve as surface-level representations, portraying a happy narrative of people who look different simply getting along (Ahmed, 2009, p. 46).  For organizations that do hire a diverse workforce, significant work still needs to be done to ensure that individuals are not used as tokens. Tokenism undermines the very essence of diversity, as it reduces individuals to mere symbols rather than recognizing their unique contributions and perspectives (Brown, 2023).

Ahmed (2009) continues this line of thought by pointing out that marginalized individuals, particularly Black feminists, face pressure to smile and appear cheerful when included in diversity initiatives or committees (p. 46). There is the unspoken pressure to show gratitude for being included.  This was particularly heartbreaking for me to read. In fact, the word ‘diversity’ now leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I have seen moments in my professional life where the focus on diversity felt superficial, more like a checklist than a genuine commitment to creating an inclusive environment. The description provided by Ahmed (2009) about how marginalized individuals are often expected to respond with gratitude and humility for being included on a diversity committee felt unsettling to me. (p. 46) As someone who tends to react impulsively (yes, I am a work in progress), I found this expectation particularly troubling. I realized I had not fully considered how these individuals might feel that their presence is conditional, which adds another layer of complexity to the conversation about inclusion and representation. 

​

Reflecting on my emotions throughout this process, starting from reading the article, then thinking deeply about it, writing about it, and eventually questioning whether I should even feel bad, has been a journey in itself. I recognize that Black people likely do not want my sympathy; this is their lived experience, something they navigate daily. Perhaps it is not about feeling bad for them but acknowledging the weight of what they face and confronting the uncomfortable truths. There is much to process, and I still do not know the right response. Nevertheless, I know that we need to stop tiptoeing around the issue. Instead of hiding behind fuzzy concepts of diversity, we need to be honest and call it what it is. How we name it is yet to be figured out.

​

Key Concepts

Emotional labor is crucial for understanding marginalized individuals' burdens, especially in diversity initiatives (Klenkel, 2024). Ahmed (2009) highlights how Black feminists manage the emotional complexities of advocating for their rights while educating others (p. 49). This dual role can be overwhelming. The Combahee River Collective (n.d.) notes that many Black feminists feel isolated and confused before grasping key feminist concepts. This journey increases their awareness of the emotional toll of their identities. As they confront patriarchy and racial oppression, they engage in emotional labor to navigate these challenges in their activism (Murray, 2016). For Ahmed (2009), theory serves as a tool for understanding but is limited by the systems it aims to critique (p. 44). In other words, while theory reveals power structures, those same structures can hinder meaningful change.

Integrating mental health into equity work is essential for promoting resilience and enhancing overall well-being (Woods-Giscombe et al., 2016). As highlighted by Woods-Giscombe et al. (2016), feminists emphasize the importance of mental health support and resources specifically designed to address their unique experiences. Advocating for resources that reflect Black women's cultural, economic, and social contexts (and all marginalized groups) fosters a deeper sense of belonging and understanding. Incorporating mental health support into equity initiatives helps to break the stigma surrounding mental health issues, particularly within communities of colour. Ultimately, true equity requires attending to all individuals' emotional and psychological needs (Castillo et al., 2019).

​

Disciplines and Relevance

Sociology, my major, is important in understanding the social structures and institutions that create and sustain inequality. It offers important insights into how culture, gender, race, and class intersect within societal systems (Edwards, 2024). Simply put, it helps us understand the complexities of these dynamics and determines the root causes of social issues or problems. Both sociology and Ahmed (2009) emphasize how social structures affect individual experiences. Ahmed (2009) examines how these same structures can both empower and limit people, creating paradoxes where individuals can be empowered to express themselves. However, at the same time, their ability to act is limited.

​

Psychology contributes significantly to equity discussions by highlighting the biases and discrimination that shape our perceptions (Zhang et al., 2023). It explores the cognitive processes that sustain stereotypes, understanding how these mental frameworks (cognitive structures through which individuals interpret) influence behaviour and societal attitudes (Zhang et al., 2023). These 'structures’ shape our beliefs and attitudes by influencing how we perceive information and experiences. This paradox of seeking belonging while honouring diversity in experiences is central to psychological principals and Ahmed’s (2009) critiques.